for 9th GE Work Group Meeting on 4/4/03,
by Harold Marcuse, April 4, 2003
html version created 4/12/03 by hm
Area A: update description to include information technology (etc.).
Possibility of giving guideline size (30?), so that faculty/depts. can ask
for resources?
Area B: no change (or: raise AP score from 3 to 4, and high school grade from C to B?)
Area C: Leave at 3 courses. Pare down list of approved courses as per criteria.
Area D: discuss chairs' feelings about reduction from 3 to 2 (pedagogic
rationale);
courses from these departments in new core Area X.
Area E: various options.
1. (TF) reduce from 3 to 2 courses, remove subdivision, pare down list.
(WCiv as special req.)
2. (Dan) 3 courses in 3 subdivisions: WCiv, Non-WCiv, "intersections"
Areas F and G: various options
1. (TF) leave as they are with new descriptions, pare down list
2. (Harold): combine and reduce from 4 to 3 courses, preferably without
subdivision
3. Reduce further to 2 courses; new offerings in new core Area X.
Special requirements
Quantitative: raise minimum AP score from 3 to 4.
Ethnicity: no change in existing; possible addition of 2nd as
spec. requirement or in core area X
Non-Western Culture: no change, or new subcategory of Area E under Dan's
proposal
Western civ.: TF proposed new special requirement
Writing-intensive: class size limitation (25/30?), rolling 3-year review
Area X: "Frontiers of Inquiry". In contrast to the other core areas, which offer overviews of broad areas of knowledge or illustrate a wide range of approaches used in a discipline, this area would contain courses that explore topics in new ways. They would either have an interdisciplinary approach to subject matter usually examined within a single discipline, or investigate concepts or subjects that are relatively new areas that are not yet established subjects in a given field.
2 or 3 courses would be required: they would balance a reduction by one each in Areas D, E, and F+G.